Yawning emptiness
Do I really have to read the SGB to find out how long the health insurance fund has to respond to my objection? And when does the deadline start for me to take legal action? Where does it even say that? SGB IV?
Do I really have to read the SGB to find out how long the health insurance fund has to respond to my objection? And when does the deadline start for me to take legal action? Where does it even say that? SGB IV?
What fascinates me so much about it is that it shows how little it takes to fix in a very short time what has been systematically destroyed by humans over the centuries.
Assuming it took you, like the average person, 1:30 minutes to read the 388 words so far, the human species has already killed another 6 million fish.
The entire seabed is destroyed over a width of 200 metres and everything that gets caught in the 120,000 square metre net is hauled in. Bycatch and overfishing send their regards.
The thought that I'm just a number with my health insurance company gives me no peace of mind. But how else should I interpret this letter?
What Spahn and Lauterbach are doing is not only unnecessary, but anti-social and lacks any justification. A person with common sense would never come up with such crooked ideas.
The legal situation is shit. The AOK employees I deal with show zero integrity. A quality that is more important to me than loyalty.
I am against the breeding of animals, so I also think any kind of pedigree dog is shit, but there are hundreds of thousands of homeless dogs (to stay with the dog example) that are just there. So what to do? Shoot them all? That's not a solution.
Nobody at the AOK checked anything. I sent off the application on Wednesday afternoon at four, presumably just before closing time. The next morning at 8.41am I had the rejection in the post.